KEYNOTE: Parallel Programming for C and C++ done right.
Please note that the slides are ALL BLACK (a kind recognition from the speaker towards New Zealand winning the Rugby World Cup in 2011)
First Compiler: 1957 – Some of the influences on design: • Punch-‐cards • OpQmizaQon (users were reluctant to switch from assembly language) • ManipulaQon of sense switches and sense lights • MathemaQcal excepQons (overflow, divide check) • Tape operaQons (read, write, rewind, backspace) 4 Photos: Wikimedia Commons (hXp://commons.wikimedia.org)
[1991]) print *, a(:, 3) ! thirdcolumn print *, a(n, :) ! last row print *, a(:3, :3) ! Leading 3-‐by-‐3 submatrix This is so important, I’ll come back to it later.
explicit notation for data decomposition • Shared memory and distributed memory systems Sum in Fortran, using co-‐array feature: REAL SUM[*] CALL SYNC_ALL( WAIT=1 ) DO IMG= 2,NUM_IMAGES() IF (IMG==THIS_IMAGE()) THEN SUM = SUM + SUM[IMG-1] ENDIF CALL SYNC_ALL( WAIT=IMG ) ENDDO Coarray Fortran (Fortran 2008 [2010])
by many parallel applications – Supported by every major compiler for Fortran and C • OpenMP 4.0 in the works !$omp parallel do do i=1,10 A(i) = B(i) * C(i) enddo !$omp end parallel OpenMP* (Open MulQ-‐Processing)
[2010]) • OpenMP* is a standard used by many parallel applications – Supported by every major compiler for Fortran, C, and C++ • OpenMP 4.0 in the works do concurrent (i=1:m) a(k+i) = a(k+i) + factor*a(l+i) end do
• avoids evil pointers – helps opQmizaQons • supports arrays directly – helps vectorizaQon • straight forward usage (no templates, etc.) – helps mask composability issues with OpenMP • SQll: C and C++ needed in the universe and they need help (more)
more than show the soluQon • I’m learning that SHOWING SOLUTIONS is useless if the PROBLEM is not FELT • Our soluQons are heavily adopted by those who were in pain already!
to C11 also) Core language runQme performance enhancements • Rvalue references and move constructors • Generalized constant expressions • ModificaQon to the definiQon of plain old data Core language build Qme performance enhancements • Extern template Core language usability enhancements • IniQalizer lists • Uniform iniQalizaQon • Type inference • Range-‐based for-‐loop • Lambda funcQons and expressions • AlternaQve funcQon syntax • Object construcQon improvement • Explicit overrides and final • Null pointer constant • Strongly typed enumeraQons • Right angle bracket • Explicit conversion operators • Alias templates • Unrestricted unions Core language funcQonality improvements • Variadic templates • New string literals • User-‐defined literals • MulQthreading memory model • Thread-‐local storage • Explicitly defaulted and deleted special member funcQons • Type long long int • StaQc asserQons • Allow sizeof to work on members of classes without an explicit object • Control and query object alignment • Allow garbage collected implementaQons C++ standard library changes • Upgrades to standard library components • Threading faciliQes • Tuple types • Hash tables • Regular expressions • General-‐purpose smart pointers • Extensible random number facility • Wrapper reference • Polymorphic wrappers for funcQon objects • Type traits for metaprogramming • Uniform method for compuQng the return type of funcQon objects Some material adopted from wikipedia.org futures & promises, async defining visibility of stores anonymous funcQons
& promises? future : think of as a consumer end of a 1-‐element produce/consumer queue • A future can be created only from an exisQng promise object. • Producer computes the value: calls set_value() on the promise. • Consumer needs the future value: it calls get() on the future. • Consumer blocks waiQng on the producer if producer has not yet set_value(). • Futures can be used via the async() member funcQon. double foo(double arg); // consider normal funcQon // You can execute foo(x) asynchronously by calling std::future<double> result = std::async(foo, x); … double val = result.get();
& promises? The problems with the future/async model are both linguisQc and performance-‐related. The key flaw is that the whole noQon of scalability with using futures was soundly refuted in the seminal 1993 paper: Space-‐efficient scheduling of mulBthreaded computaBons by Blumofe and Leiserson. This is the paper that moQvated the development of Cilk in the first place.
& promises? The linguisQc problems are more subtle. The following two statements that do roughly the same thing: std::future<double> result = std::async(foo, x); double result = cilk_spawn foo(x); The first statement looks like a call to async(). The second statement looks like a call to foo().
& promises? SemanQcally, consider the following: std::string s(“hello”); int bar(const std::string& s); std::future<int> result = std::async(bar, s + “ world”); The above statement is intended to pass “hello world” to bar and run it asynchronously. The problem is that s + “ world” is a temporary object that gets destroyed as soon as the statement completes.
& promises? SemanQcally, consider the following: std::string s(“hello”); int bar(const std::string& s); std::future<int> result = std::async(bar, s + “ world”); The above statement is intended to pass “hello world” to bar and run it asynchronously. The problem is that s + “ world” is a temporary object that gets destroyed as soon as the statement completes.
& promises? std::string s(“hello”); int bar(const std::string& s); std::future<int> result = std::async(bar, s + “ world”); Boosters of std::async will counter that all you need is to add a lambda: std::future<int> result = std::async([&]{ bar(s + “ world”); }); Without the lambda -‐ it is a race condiBon that should not exist in a linguisQcally sound parallel construct, but it is preXy much unavoidable in a library-‐only specificaQon.
• a beauQful example of HARDWARE making life “simple again” helping CONCURRENCY / PARALLEL PROGRAMMING • HLE is a hint inserted in front of a LOCK operaQon to indicate a region is a candidate for lock elision – XACQUIRE (0xF2) and XRELEASE (0xF3) prefixes – Don’t actually acquire lock, but execute region speculaQvely – Hardware buffers loads and stores, checkpoints registers – Hardware aXempts to commit atomically without locks – If cannot do without locks, restart, execute non-‐speculaQvely • RTM is three new instrucQons (XBEGIN, XEND, XABORT) – Similar operaQon as HLE (except no locks, new ISA) – If cannot commit atomically, go to handler indicated by XBEGIN – Provides so•ware addiQonal capabiliQes over HLE
First System 1 TF/s Sustained (with 2/3rd of the system built… 7264 Intel® PenQum Pro processors) OS: Cougar 72 Cabinets 2011 First Chip 1 TF/s Sustained One 22nm Chip OS: Linux* One PCI express slot ASCI Red: 1 TeraFlop/sec December 1996 Knights Corner: 1 TeraFlop/sec November 2011 Source and Photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCI_Red * Full system 1.3 TeraFlop/sec, later upgraded to 3.1 TeraFlops/sec with 9298 Intel® PenQum II Xeon processors * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others. Intel: ShaXering Barriers More than one sustained TeraFlop/sec
First System 1 TF/s Sustained (with 2/3rd of the system built… 7264 Intel® PenQum Pro processors) OS: Cougar 72 Cabinets 2011 First Chip 1 TF/s Sustained One 22nm Chip OS: Linux* One PCI express slot ASCI Red: 1 TeraFlop/sec December 1996 Knights Corner: 1 TeraFlop/sec November 2011 Source and Photo: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCI_Red * Full system 1.3 TeraFlop/sec, later upgraded to 3.1 TeraFlops/sec with 9298 Intel® PenQum II Xeon processors * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Most popular C++ abstracQon ü Windows* ü Linux* ü Mac OS* X ü Xbox 360 ü Solaris* ü FreeBSD* ü Intel processors ü AMD processors ü SPARC processors ü IBM processors ü open source ü standard commiXee submissions The most used method to parallelize C++ programs * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
Blocks Concurrent Containers Common idioms for concurrent access -‐ a scalable alternaQve serial container with a lock around it Miscellaneous Thread-‐safe Qmers Generic Parallel Algorithms Efficient scalable way to exploit the power of mulQ-‐core without having to start from scratch Task scheduler The engine that empowers parallel algorithms that employs task-‐stealing to maximize concurrency SynchronizaQon PrimiQves User-‐level and OS wrappers for mutual exclusion, ranging from atomic operaQons to several flavors of mutexes and condiQon variables Memory AllocaQon Per-‐thread scalable memory manager and false-‐sharing free allocators Threads OS API wrappers Thread Local Storage Scalable implementaQon of thread-‐local data that supports infinite number of TLS
Graph: Components New Feature as of TBB 4.0 Release (2011) • Graph object – Contains a pointer to the root task – Owns tasks created on behalf of the graph – Users can wait for the compleQon of all tasks of the graph • Graph nodes – Implement sender and/or receiver interfaces – Nodes manage messages and/or execute funcQon objects • Edges – Connect predecessors to successors Graph object == graph handle Graph node Edge
Intel® Cilk™ Plus, three keywords to go parallel cilk_for (int i=0; i<n; ++i) {! Foo(a[i]);! }! Open specification at cilkplus.org Parallel loops made easy
Intel® Cilk™ Plus, three keywords to go parallel cilk_for (int i=0; i<n; ++i) {! Foo(a[i]);! }! Open specification at cilkplus.org int fib(int n)! {! if (n <= 2)! return n;! else {! int x,y;! x = fib(n-1);! y = fib(n-2);! return x+y;! }! }! int fib(int n)! {! if (n <= 2)! return n;! else {! int x,y;! x = cilk_spawn fib(n-1);! y = fib(n-2);! cilk_sync;! return x+y;! }! }! Turn serial code Into parallel code Parallel loops made easy
ü Linux* ü Mac OS* X ü gcc: experimental branch ü open specificaQon ü other compiler vendors reviewing ü standard commiXee submissions * Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others.
but limited by language void v_add (float *c, float *a, float *b) { for (int i=0; i<= MAX; i++) c[i]=a[i]+b[i]; } • C/C++ language implies that vectorizing this loop is “illegal” • Some code can be re-written in a way that the compiler can vectorize • Hard to learn • Impossible to completely automate Consider a Solution: Allow the programmer to express operations without unintended serial execution, using a new syntax.
Array NotaQons à Vector OperaQons <array base> [<lower bound>:<length>[:<stride>]]+ ! A[:] // All of vector A B[2:6] // Elements 2 to 7 of vector B C[:][5] // Column 5 of matrix C D[0:3:2] // Elements 0,2,4 of vector D + + + + + + + + if (a[:] > b[:]) { c[:] = d[:] * e[:]; } else { c[:] = d[:] * 2; } A simple and elegant solution: a language construct for vector level parallelism.
helpful feature: Elemental FuncQons __declspec (vector) __declspec (vector) double option_price_call_black_scholes( double S, // spot (underlying) price double K, // strike (exercise) price, double r, // interest rate double sigma, // volatility double time) // time to maturity { double time_sqrt = sqrt(time); double d1 = (log(S/K)+r*time)/(sigma*time_sqrt)+0.5*sigma*time_sqrt; double d2 = d1-‐(sigma*time_sqrt); return S*N(d1) -‐ K*exp(-‐r*time)*N(d2); } // invoke calculations for call-‐options cilk_for (int i=0; i<NUM_OPTIONS; i++) { call[i] = option_price_call_black_scholes(S[i], K[i], r, sigma, time[i]); } Use a function to describe the operation on a single element Invoke the function in a data parallel context The compiler generates vector version(s) of the function: Can yield a vector of results as fast as a single result. The secret sauce __declspec (vector)
Elemental Functions Construct Example Seman)cs Standard for loop for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { a[j] = my_ef(b[j]); } Single thread, auto vectorizaQon #pragma simd #pragma simd for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { a[j] = my_ef(b[j]); } Single thread, Guaranteed to use the vector version cilk for loop cilk_for (j = 0; j < N; j++) { a[j] = my_ef(b[j]); } Both vectorizaQon and concurrent execuQon Array notaQon a[:] = my_ef(b[:]); VectorizaQon. Concurrency allowed (but not yet implemented in compilers) The execution of the elemental functions is serial with respect to the code that follows the invocation.
“auto” vectorization // vectorizable outer loop #pragma simd for (i=0; i<n; i++) { complex<float> c = a[i]; complex<float> z = c; int j = 0; while ((j < 255) && (abs(z)< limit)) { z = z*z + c; j++; }; color[i] = j; } • Combine standard C/C++ syntax with vector semantics. • This program results in good utilization of vector level parallelism and provides measureable speedups. • Arguably out of reach of auto vectorizers • Outlining the loop body can be written as an elemental function. Yet, inline code is normally more efficient.
Plus make a great combinaQon • Vector parallelism – Cilk Plus has two syntaxes for vector parallelism • Array NotaQon • #pragma simd – TBB relies on things outside TBB for vector parallelism. • TBB + #pragma simd is an aXracQve combinaQon • Thread parallelism – Cilk Plus is a strict fork-‐join language • Straitjacket enables strong guarantees about space. – TBB permits arbitrary task graphs • “Flexibility provides hanging rope.” 74
• Parallel Hardware – Scale – Vectorize – SpecializaQon We know how to do “scale” and “vectorize” so let’s do that. Tapping “specializaQon” is new, unproven and needs years of pain before we standardize.
using TBB and Cilk™ Plus • Intel Threading Building Blocks (TBB) • Most popular C++ parallel programming abstracQon • Book available in American English www.parallelbook.com
using TBB and Cilk™ Plus • Teaching structured parallel programming • Designed for programmers not computer architects • Teach best methods (known as paXerns) Coming: July 2012 www.parallelbook.com
multicoreworld
slephy2784
mraible
suu_mire0726
kentaroutakeda
ryunakayama
tomokusaba
ivargrimstad
linew_official
h455h1
xiombatsg
hanyudaeiiti
fsubal
jakevdp
brad_frost
productmarketing
palkan
akmur
sferik
keavy
frogandcode
mclloyd
shpigford
rocio
chrislema
